Brian Halstead
Professor Autumn McKelvey
ENG102 – 28903_4122
09 May 2012
Rooting is a Civil Choice
The ability to root is a civil choice until users start stealing services for free. Copyright laws are starting to take on a new aspect: cell phone companies want to make it illegal to root our electronic devices. On July 26, 2010 the U.S. Library of Congress made exemptions to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.(Miller). This means it was legal to root, unlock or hack a smartphone in any way as long as this wasn’t being done to get around copyright protection.
The term “rooting” means the owner of the electronic device has enabled themselves administrative rights to the device. Rooting is a term used specifically for Linux operating systems giving the user superuser permissions. All Android cell phones have a version of Linux operating systems installed on them. If the owner of a rooted phone wants to change service providers they can with the same rooted phone. This is not common since most cellular providers want consumers to purchase a new phone. This enables better technical support if problems arise.
Having the right to root or hack electronic devices is the right of the consumer since that is who owns the device, and that makes personalization acceptable. Cellular companies believe changes made to the software increases the costs for troubleshooting.
While rooting is the consumer’s right, many companies are trying to make it illegal (Alba). Currently, rooting any device will void the consumer’s warranty. Companies argue that rooting a device ruins the software installed on the device and it could lead to “bricking” the device. A bricked cell phone is one that no longer works and is about as useful as a “brick” for making a phone call. “Bricking a cell phone, however, does not mean it has reached the end of its life” according to electronics expert [Dave Taylor]. The ability to troubleshoot these problems makes it time consuming for warranties to be handled efficiently.
The people who originally program these devices use open source. That makes the device completely open for anyone to purchase and install whatever programs they want to use on it. Cell phone companies use proprietary software for commercial reasons. The Software Freedom Law Center feels that this is unconstitutional to the consumers. In 2009 the Electronic Frontier Foundation won the Digital Millennium Copyright Act giving consumers the right to run operating systems and applications from any source, not just those approved by the manufacturer (Colophon).
There is a large market of free applications for android phones. These free applications make their money selling advertisement space called “pop-ups”. The consumer always has the option to eliminate the advertisements by purchasing the application. This is where some might get upset. The benefit of rooting enables consumers to choose if he/she wants those advertisements on their devices. The companies who provide these applications consider this a form of theft.
The argument is, if the consumer purchased the phone, isn’t it theirs to do as they wish? In comparison, if the owner of an automobile wants to change the air filter or spark plugs for better performance, car manufacturers don’t normally void warranties. Why is rooting any different?
Cell phone companies will argue that rooting your phone will make you more vulnerable for viruses or hackers to steal information. There is security software available to root users to prevent these vulnerabilities. Rooting gives consumers the ability to personalize security. While this might make it more difficult for hackers to steal information, it also makes it difficult for technical support operators to troubleshoot.
Android software is all open-source which makes it legal to alter (“The The GNU Operating System”). Open-source is free software, it’s a matter of liberty, not price. Think of “free” as in “free speech,” not as in “free beer.” Free software is a matter of the users freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software. This is where the concerns of copyright laws get thin. Computer companies argue that they have the right to own the software installed on the devices consumers purchase.
In conclusion, while there are many benefits to rooting a phone, there are also disadvantages. While rooting remains legal, technical support costs will continue to rise, and programmers will keep loosing money. Rooting is a civil choice for now.
Works Cited
Alba, Luis. “Don’t Let Rooting and Jailbreaking Go Back to Being Illegal.” Don’t Let Rooting and Jailbreaking Go Back to Being Illegal. 26 Jan. 2012. Yosolosy. 09 Apr. 2012 <http://yss1.net/2012/01/26/dont-let-rooting-and-jailbreaking-go-back-to-being-illegal/>.
Colophon. “DMCA exemption update: SFLC replies to content industry – Software Freedom Law Center.” Software Freedom Law Center. 5 Mar. 2012. CC-BY-SA 3.0. 09 Apr. 2012 <http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2012/mar/05/DMCA-update-SFLC-replies-to-content-industry/>.
Miller, Paul. “Library of Congress adds DMCA exception for jailbreaking or rooting your phone.” Engadget. 26 July 2010. NPR. 09 Apr. 2012
<http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/26/library-of-congress-adds-dmca-exception-for-jailbreaking-or-root/>.
“The GNU Operating System.” The GNU General Public License V3.0. Free Software Foundation, Inc., 29 June 2007. Web. 19 Apr. 2012. <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>.
Like this:
Like Loading...